It is no secret that historic house museums across the
country have largely been struggling.
Struggling to keep up increasingly creaky old buildings. Struggling to draw income for said upkeep
(and utilities, and salaries).
Struggling to attract audiences in a time when our population is
becoming much more diverse and there are more and more options for our leisure
time.
In many ways, it is a puzzle that historic house museums are
struggling quite so much. Aside from the
question if there are too many of them (likely yes), historic house museums are
relevant to all of our lives. After all,
we all live in homes our houses of some type, and we all have families. And just like our own homes, historic house
museums embody the complexities of human nature. They have stories of heartbreak and joy,
domestic tiffs, sibling rivalry, celebrations, and love. They are also places where people lost their
keys, had chores to do, and dog hair collected in corners behind doors.
Thus they are highly familiar, but each one is also unique
and unknown to visitors, and given the human drama that likely took place in
most of them, they should be hugely popular with visitors.
And yet they struggle.
Perhaps it is the medium?
Connecticut Landmarks’
previous work with Reach Advisors shed light in how polarizing guided tours,
the default interpretive mechanism for most historic houses, are to
museum-goers, but it also began to get us thinking about how a house could be a
more immersive experience
for visitors as well. Clearly we needed
to think about new ways of sharing these houses.
But perhaps it is also the stories that we have chosen to
share. We must be honest . . . a good
number of historic house museum tours focus on the lives of (mostly wealthy)
white men and/or their wives . . . and not necessarily on the other members of
the household, such as slaves, servants, extended family, or children. Sometimes the story of these white men is the
appropriate story to tell, but often the stories of others are more compelling,
relevant, and interesting to visitors.
At Connecticut Landmarks, there is constant discussion of
how to cost-effectively yet also engagingly share the stories of the
significant properties we own around the state.
We also are looking carefully at trends that are shaping the future of
Connecticut, including shifting demographic patterns, an aging population, and
how technology is shaping our daily lives and expectations for our leisure time
and informal learning.
We decided that waiting to figure out how to better engage
broader audiences was too risky. Simply
relying on guided tours was too risky.
We cannot expect our visitors to change . . . we have to change to be
more relevant, engaging, and most of all, meaningful to our visitors.
We don’t have the answers, and we likely don’t even have the
right questions yet, but we decided to begin asking questions and seeking
solutions by putting together a crack interpretive team to develop a new
interpretive plan for one of our properties:
The Joshua Hempsted House,
located in New London, CT. This blog
shares the process they will be taking to develop that plan.
Susie Wilkening is a Senior Consultant and Curator of Museum
Audiences at Reach Advisors. She will be
leading several phases of audience research for this project.
Photos: interior and exterior of The Joshua Hempsted House, courtesy of Connecticut Landmarks
Photos: interior and exterior of The Joshua Hempsted House, courtesy of Connecticut Landmarks
No comments:
Post a Comment