For the last museum field trip for the students, we chose
the RISD Museum – our only visit to an art museum. 24 kids and 4 adults arrived for a day of
looking at art.
The students arrived at the Museum after a week of summer
rain – and they were pumped up. We were
self guided, so no staff came out to give us an introduction to the Museum.
That was fine with me as, after all, the students had rated the brief
introductions at other museum experiences extremely low. In hindsight, this was
an error on our part.
The RISD Museum is a very different environment that the
previous museums we had gone to. There are 2000-year-old fragile objects open
to the air within. Guards roam the galleries kindly asking visitors to keep a
reasonable distance from the artifact, don’t run, and be quite. OK this last
one has always bothered me. The theory here is that you will disturb other
visitors, but since so many labels in art museums often lack even basic context,
how exactly are visitors supposed to learn within these walls without talking?
If art is directly connected to emotion, why are we asked to be so
dispassionate? I must admit that some of
the kids broke all of these rules. All of the students shot through the
galleries in just short of a run – the guards’ radios crackled for our entire
visit.
Finally we got to a show of current artwork – “Locally
Made.” Here was artwork that was visually compelling, but not easily
understood. Many of the students stopped
to try and figure out what these might be about. “It’s like ‘Where The Wild
Things Are,’ but there’s a dead guy next to him,” one of the students remarked while
looking at a canvas. The description was apt. The friendly and relaxed guard
engaged the students while explaining why they should not touch the art in a
very respectful way.
The group came back together for lunch, and we decided to
re-group. What could we do with the kids that would interest them? The program
for the day included this:
Micah Salkind curates The Re-sounding City from 7/23-7/28.
In “The Re-sounding City” six Providence DJs spin one-hour
sets that speak to their experiences of life in The Creative Capital. Curators
and DJs Micah Jackson will be on-site to talk and dance about the Assembly with
audiences, asking them to contribute drawings and text indexing their
impressions in archival leger, a document that will compliment audio recordings
of the one-hour performances. — Micah Salkind
Perfect and very cool! We thought that the kids would find
this both appealing and familiar. After lunch we marched over the Contemporary
Art Gallery just as the program began. The music was not too loud, the space
did not have fragile items in it, and the staff was friendly and excited. The students
spent the next 30 minutes horsing around and chatting with each other. I asked
the Writers Block staff what was up – did the kids have any connection to this
music? The answer is no – they are too young. As teenagers their musical
experience is often limited to today’s pop tunes. While friendly, the staff did
not engage the students despite the program description.
So now what? How could we get these kids involved in this
museum? How will we fill the 2 hours left before the bus comes back? I decided
to try my own role as tour guide. “Did everyone see the mummy? How old do you think
this is?” (Guesses ranged from 200 to 20,000 years.) My guided tour could not compete with the kids
next to them. These students had now spent over 5 weeks with each other and
were much more interested in just hanging out with their friends than listening
to me –or anyone else for that matter.
Toward the end of the visit some of the students slowed down
and engaged with the art. There was a piece of Herman Miller upholstery fabric
designed by Alexander Girard and a video art installation that made the kids
stop and question what was going on. The fabric pattern appeared to be cursive
writing – but was not quite readable, and the video appeared to have a
narrative which was just as allusive. They thought the fabric was cool, the
video art – just confusing. I had to agree with them there. Who is video art
for anyway?
At the end of the visit I wondered:
- Should we have read them the riot act when we got there?
- Could we have better prepared them for a successful visit?
- Would the kids that had never been to an art museum before be able to have a better experience next time at an art museum, now that they understand a little more what is expected of them as visitors?
I don’t know the answers to these questions, but I do know
that for most students this museum clearly communicated to most of these kids –
‘we are not the place for you’ despite institutional efforts to address a wider
audience. If the Hempstead house is to be successful reaching much larger
audiences, we must identify when, where and how our historic house inadvertently
sends the same message.
Robert
Kiihne of RK
Exhibits will be participating in the teen audience research this summer and
will draft the exhibitions component of the interpretive plan in the fall.
No comments:
Post a Comment